April 13, 2026 | Abuja, Nigeria
The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has strongly criticised the Federal Government’s recently released terrorism sponsors list, describing it as “a theatre of absurdity” and alleging that it is aimed at misleading both domestic and international audiences.
IPOB’s Position
In a press statement issued on Monday, spokesperson Emma Powerful dismissed the list as “a farce,” arguing that it lacks credibility and is politically motivated.
The group maintained that the publication was not a genuine security initiative but rather an attempt to reshape public perception and deflect attention from broader governance and security concerns.
Allegations Against the Government
IPOB accused Nigerian authorities of double standards, alleging that the state has historically failed to adequately protect civilians while simultaneously attempting to label dissenting groups as security threats.
The statement referenced past incidents of violence and enforcement actions in parts of southeastern Nigeria, arguing that peaceful expressions of self-determination have often been met with force.
Defence of Movement’s Activities
Reaffirming its stance, IPOB insisted that it is not a terrorist organisation and described itself as a “people-driven movement” advocating for self-determination.
The group also argued that its activities in several foreign jurisdictions remain lawful, suggesting that international recognition contradicts the Nigerian government’s classification.
Reaction to Terrorism List
According to IPOB, the terrorism sponsors list represents an effort to:
Intimidate perceived opposition voices
Influence international opinion
Reinforce a particular narrative about security challenges in Nigeria
However, the group claimed that such efforts would not deter its advocacy or weaken its support base.
Broader Implications
The statement concluded with a renewed commitment to its objectives, emphasizing that calls for self-determination should not be criminalized.
The development adds another layer to the ongoing debate surrounding security, governance, and civil liberties in Nigeria, as tensions persist between authorities and separatist movements over classification, legality, and national unity.
Post a Comment